<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gamesmanship Revisited</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lifeintherough.com/2007/04/30/gamesmanship-revisited/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lifeintherough.com/2007/04/30/gamesmanship-revisited/</link>
	<description>My Quest to Become a Golf Pro</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 00:20:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.lifeintherough.com/2007/04/30/gamesmanship-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-15333</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 16:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifeintherough.com/?p=36#comment-15333</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a fair philosophy, Dennis. It seems that people break down in two categories on this issue. Those that believe, as you said, that you should win or lose on only your own merits, and those that believe you should use anything you can to your advantage, short of cheating.

Let me twist up the question a little. Let&#039;s say that you&#039;re playing with someone who is employing gamesmanship and you recognize it. Would you then decide to counter back with some of your own, or would you just put it out of your head and not be affected? Please understand that if you say that you&#039;d counter with gamesmanship, I&#039;m not trying to paint you as a hypocrite or anything. I&#039;m just wondering if it changes anything if the opponent pushes the issue, and if so, I&#039;m wondering if it warrants a response. Almost like an opponent using gamesmanship is breaking a truce of mutual respect and then wouldn&#039;t deserve respect in return.

Also keep in mind that I&#039;m not talking about playing with certain people competitively for fun, where you can just decide not to play with them anymore if you don&#039;t like it. I&#039;m thinking more in terms of tournaments or leagues where you don&#039;t choose the opponents and have to just get through and deal with it. I guess the basic question is, is there a time when all bets are off and war should be declared?

I do agree with you, though, that there&#039;s probably not room for it in the basic philosophy of the game. But intense competition puts a different spin on things. Or, it does in practice, anyway, even if it shouldn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a fair philosophy, Dennis. It seems that people break down in two categories on this issue. Those that believe, as you said, that you should win or lose on only your own merits, and those that believe you should use anything you can to your advantage, short of cheating.</p>
<p>Let me twist up the question a little. Let&#8217;s say that you&#8217;re playing with someone who is employing gamesmanship and you recognize it. Would you then decide to counter back with some of your own, or would you just put it out of your head and not be affected? Please understand that if you say that you&#8217;d counter with gamesmanship, I&#8217;m not trying to paint you as a hypocrite or anything. I&#8217;m just wondering if it changes anything if the opponent pushes the issue, and if so, I&#8217;m wondering if it warrants a response. Almost like an opponent using gamesmanship is breaking a truce of mutual respect and then wouldn&#8217;t deserve respect in return.</p>
<p>Also keep in mind that I&#8217;m not talking about playing with certain people competitively for fun, where you can just decide not to play with them anymore if you don&#8217;t like it. I&#8217;m thinking more in terms of tournaments or leagues where you don&#8217;t choose the opponents and have to just get through and deal with it. I guess the basic question is, is there a time when all bets are off and war should be declared?</p>
<p>I do agree with you, though, that there&#8217;s probably not room for it in the basic philosophy of the game. But intense competition puts a different spin on things. Or, it does in practice, anyway, even if it shouldn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.lifeintherough.com/2007/04/30/gamesmanship-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-15331</link>
		<dc:creator>dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 14:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifeintherough.com/?p=36#comment-15331</guid>
		<description>Golf, being a 90% mental game is hard enough without having to deal with the unwarrented comments 
of an opponent....I don&#039;t think that in the true meaning of the game there is any place for verbal or physical
gamesmanship....If you can not beat an opponent on your own game and the preparations that one puts
into getting ready for a game both mental and physical...then you do not deserve to win with any amount 
of honor....take your winnings backhandedy ... you did not deserve to win....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Golf, being a 90% mental game is hard enough without having to deal with the unwarrented comments<br />
of an opponent&#8230;.I don&#8217;t think that in the true meaning of the game there is any place for verbal or physical<br />
gamesmanship&#8230;.If you can not beat an opponent on your own game and the preparations that one puts<br />
into getting ready for a game both mental and physical&#8230;then you do not deserve to win with any amount<br />
of honor&#8230;.take your winnings backhandedy &#8230; you did not deserve to win&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

