Hit Down on the Golf Ball With the Driver?

Oct

2007

Hit Down With the Driver?

Posted by Double Eagle in Instruction

Welcome to Life in the Rough! If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. If you'd like to explore a bit, click here to find links to information about me, plenty of golf tips, reviews, and more. Thanks for visiting!

I just finished reading the November 2007 issue of Golf Digest and am a little confused.

In this month’s Breaking 100/90/80/70 section, Bobby Clampett sings the praises of hitting down on the ball. In his estimation, the bottom of the swing arc should be about four inches in front of the ball, meaning that when the club makes contact with the ball, it is still moving downward.

I can buy that. In fact, I just covered it in my post about the general misunderstanding of what hitting down on the ball means. What I’m a little surprised about is his point that the driver should be included in that category.

In the article, he says:

I’m blown away that so many reputable golf teachers instruct their students to strike the driver on the upswing. Regardless of whether a ball is on a tee or on a ground, the swing bottom must consistently be four inches in front of the ball. And swinging slightly down on the ball with the driver goes a long way toward ensuring that.

He goes on to give a couple of reasons why hitting down with a driver is important, including helping to keep the left wrist flat at impact.

He’s blown away? I’m blown away.

I can’t say that I’ve ever heard a pro or read an instruction book that said to hit down on the ball with the driver. Every piece of advice I’ve ever been exposed to says that the driver should strike the ball with a level to slightly ascending blow.

Sure, it’s probably been said somewhere. You can probably find someone recommending just about anything with the golf swing.

As you know, I like to talk about the swing but I’m not a pro (yet). So, I’m left wondering what to think. Listen to everything I’ve ever read and heard about hitting the driver, or listen to Bobby Clampett? That may have sounded sarcastic, but it wasn’t. After the Stack and Tilt phenomenon, I’m not discounting anything out of hand anymore.

The only option at this point is to check out some video.

Here’s a slow motion look at Tiger Woods hitting the driver. Pay special attention to the close-up of impact near the end of the video.

Now, just for the sake of not putting all our eggs in the Tiger basket, let’s have a look at Trevor Immelman. Again, pay close attention to the close-up of impact near the end.

Trevor Immelman on YouTube (sorry, I can’t embed that particular video here).

In both cases, it looks to me as if the club head is imparting a level hit on the ball. I’m not seeing any descending blow, though it’s not easy to tell on video sometimes. I will say with confidence that it doesn’t seem like either of those players was bottoming out four inches in front of the ball.

I watched a few other videos trying to find any evidence that I could that anyone was hitting drivers with an downward blow. I found a couple on YouTube (search for “swing vision”) where it looked like club head did dip right after impact, but it seems like maybe it’s more from the force of impact.

Here’s Phil Mickelson:

To me, it looks more like the force of impact makes the back of the club dip toward the ground, not so much that he’s hitting the ball with a descending blow. Pay close attention to the leading edge at the bottom of the club face.

One thing is certain: this advice is definitely in opposition to conventional wisdom.

And, I’ll also say this: whether Clampett is right or wrong, hitting the driver with a slightly descending blow should only result in a few less yards of carry and a slightly higher ball flight, due to increased spin. At the same time, if a descending blow somehow leads to better ball striking (say, with more crispness or consistency, for instance), then it could be worth it.

What do you think? Have you ever heard mainstream advice that recommended hitting down with the driver? Do you do it yourself (on purpose)?

Did you like this post? Get free RSS updates!

Leave a comment | Comment Policy | Trackback URL

There are currently 23 responses to “Hit Down With the Driver?”

1
Mike Pedersen Golf said:

There may be a reason why Clampett has been on Tour for MANY years !! Those magazines are the death of a golfers swing if he/she tries everything that’s in them EVERY month!!

Find out your swing faults, correct them, and stay focused on what YOU need to do to play better golf. Don’t let magazines stray you from your game!

Posted on October 7th, 2007 at 10:10 am
2
Mike Pedersen Golf said:

Oops! I mean “hasn’t” been on Tour! LOL

Posted on October 7th, 2007 at 10:11 am
3
Double Eagle said:

I think I agree, Mike. Learning about golf and the golf swing by reading books and magazines is fine. But to shape your game, you really need to see a pro.

These tips that appear every month in these magazines are often times very brief and may or may not be applicable to an individual player’s game. Just because someone slices the ball doesn’t mean that a specific tip or drill will solve the actual problem.

It’s good to experiment and learn, but you can’t just go out and rebuild your swing every month. And without a doubt, a lot of these tips can make a bad swing worse if they are misunderstood and not applied in correct situations.

Posted on October 7th, 2007 at 10:43 am
4
keith said:

Looking at the video, I noticed tiger does not seem to tee the ball up very far. He hit the ball on the top portion of the club face.

Posted on October 7th, 2007 at 4:36 pm
5
Double Eagle said:

With the big-headed drivers on the market today, typically the sweet spot is slightly above center. That’s the spot that gives the optimum launch angle, combined with the least amount of backspin.

As a general guideline, I like to tee the ball up so that with the sole of the driver sitting on the ground behind the ball, approximately half the ball is above the club face. That gives me the perfect height to hit it just a hair above center on the club face (when I manage to make a good swing).

Posted on October 7th, 2007 at 6:01 pm
6
Hitting Down With the Driver - Revisited » Life in the Rough said:

[...] Back in October, I commented on an article that appeared in Golf Digest where Bobby Clampett indicated that players should strike the ball with a downward, or descending, blow with the driver. You can read the original post here. [...]

Posted on February 12th, 2008 at 4:27 pm
7
Clive Scarff said:

All the power is in the downswing, why would anyone want to hit up with the club that is supposed to go the farthest? Clampett is dead right. And a great player in his time. I cover this very issue in a chapter of Hit Down Dammit! Clive Scarff

Posted on March 3rd, 2008 at 1:59 am
8
Double Eagle said:

I see where you’re coming from, Clive.

However, there are some factors that I see coming into play. With the physics of driving a golf ball, three important factors are launch angle, ball spin, and club head speed.

I don’t have access to the equipment necessary to scientifically test hitting down versus hitting up/level, but if hitting down gives the optimum launch angle and ball spin, then I can see a case being made.

With respect to club head speed, typically the club is still accelerating as it makes contact with the ball. Striking the ball sooner in the swing means less club head speed. Does it make enough difference to matter? Again, I don’t know because I can’t test it.

The only evidence I have is circumstantial: namely that those who do have access to equipment to measure these things (tour pros) continue to strive to hit their drives with a level or slightly ascending strike.

Now, just because most people do something one way doesn’t mean that way is the best. I’m open to the possibility that Clampett and you are on to something. I’d just need to see some science behind the concepts to be truly convinced.

Posted on March 3rd, 2008 at 11:28 am
9
Clive Scarff said:

Thanks to opening your mind on the subject, and re-visiting the subject itself. However, I have to question the notion that tour pros “strive to hit their drives with a level or slightly ascending strike”. I think that is an assumption and am curiuos to know on what you base this assumption. Keep in mind that the flatter shaft angle of a driver, and the forward ball position usually used with a driver will create a less steep angle of attack, without the player having to resist hitting down. That is the beauty of the equipment. The same swing with a pitching wedge will create a much steeper angle of attack, creating the illusion the player is hitting down more with his wedge than say his driver.

Finally, with respect to clubhead speed, hopefully the science is obvious that the clubhead is travelling the fastest on the way down, and slowing down on the way up. To hit the ball on the way up would be to hit it when the clubhead is slowing down, defeating the purpose of even using a driver in the first place (if distance was the goal).

Many thanks,

Clive

Posted on March 10th, 2008 at 6:27 pm
10
Double Eagle said:

Clive,

I’m not sure that you can say that the club head is moving at maximum speed simply because it is descending. If gravity was the primary factor in club head speed, then I could certainly agree, but it’s not. In fact, it’s the turning of the torso, shoulders, and hips that bring the club through impact and give the club its speed. The phrase “accelerate through impact” originates from the fact that the club head is still accelerating as it strikes the ball and that it reaches its maximum speed somewhere after the hit, well after it begins moving in a *slightly* upward arc.

Regarding where I’ve come to understand that tour pros strive to hit the ball with a level or *slightly* ascending strike, I have to say that so far, Bobby Clampett and yourself are the only individuals I’ve ever heard counter that bit of conventional teaching. Every instructional book or article I’ve ever read and every teacher I’ve ever spoken to or heard discussing the subject says that. Now, because something is “accepted” doesn’t make it so, but it’s certainly not something that I just observed myself out of the blue. I can’t recall ever hearing a tour pro indicating that he was trying to strike a drive with a descending blow (until Clampett, of course).

As I mentioned in the post, high-speed photography of the swings of many top Tour pros are available on YouTube. The arc of the club head is clearly visible and the ones I’ve seen clearly show a level to slightly ascending strike.

If you can point me to any other tour pro or notable teacher (besides yourself or Clampett) that plays or teaches that, I’m more than happy to do further reading/research on the matter.

Posted on March 10th, 2008 at 6:59 pm
11
Troy said:

I know that I’m a little late to the party, but I came across Clampett’s book “The Impact Zone” this morning and put his 4-inch downward strike to use today with exceptional results – even with a driver.

After searching the web tonight and reading the Golf Digest articles which this idea is discussed, I feel the collections of articles are missing THE CRITICAL DRILL that’s discussed in the book to help the understanding of this theory a bit better.

In the book Clampett suggest marking a line in sand and setting up to the line as if it were a ball and make your normal swing. Next check the divot. If it starts at the line and moves forward you’re making a descending blow. If it is behind the line and goes to the line you’re not making the optimal descending blow. So jump in a bunker or something of the sorts and grab a 5-iron give it a try and the results might be helpful or confirm something that you already know about your swing.

Posted on June 5th, 2008 at 1:00 am
12
Double Eagle said:

Very interesting, Troy! I’m definitely planning on reading the book. I’m also interested to hear how you make out as time goes on.

Posted on June 5th, 2008 at 11:41 am
13
Clive said:

Just a note to say that last week I finished filming for the instructional DVD “Hit Down Dammit!”. As part of filming, we employed the Photron fast speed camera. This is the exact same camera used for “Swing Vision” on CBS’s golf coverage. At an unbelievable 9,000 frames per second, we got some great footage of what happens at impact, both with an iron and a driver. Once it is ready I will be happy to provide a link to some sample video for those of you interested.

Posted on June 5th, 2008 at 5:58 pm
14
Double Eagle said:

That would be awesome, Clive. I’m very interested to learn more and I’m sure the readers are as well.

Posted on June 5th, 2008 at 7:48 pm
15
Troy said:

Cool, Double Eagle, I’ll keep you updated. I came across your site last night looking up the Bobby Clampett 4-inch deal and Google lead me to this site after a few clicks. I’m glad I found it. Interesting stuff. What’s neat to me, after reading a few post, I’ve concluded we’re roughly the same age, build, and skill level at this moment in time. So it will be interesting following your path and comparing it with how I’m doing on the links. Anyways, best of luck and I have booked marked your site for future references.

Posted on June 5th, 2008 at 11:33 pm
16
Double Eagle said:

I’m glad to have you aboard, Troy.

-Mike

Posted on June 6th, 2008 at 10:29 am
17
Jon said:

Here is my thoughts on the matter of striking down with the driver. When you swing the driver it is the same swing except of course the plane changes. You have the feeling that you are striking down on the ball – this helps give the flat left wrist at impact. However, because the ball is set up toward the front of the body the club is actually traveling upwards. So there you have it – its both.

Posted on October 29th, 2008 at 5:37 pm
18
Clive said:

Jon has hit on a very important point. All Tour Pros (and all very good players) hit down with their driver. What confuses people, and Jon has recognized this, is some catch the ball further along in the swing arc, as the club is rising. Making contact with the ball as the clubhead is rising is VASTLY different to “hitting up”. That said, nowadays most pros hit the ball on the downswing with their driver for better trajectory and control. Search YouTube for “Phil Mickelson hitting down” for an example. In the meantime, the DVD “Hit Down Dammit!” is now out and available at http://www.hitdowndammit.com for those who are curious. Thanks, Clive .

Posted on October 29th, 2008 at 6:22 pm
19
Double Eagle said:

I think we might be stuck a little bit in semantics. The fact that the club head is traveling up is really the main point I was making, not that the player should consciously try to hit up at the ball.

But I think the opposite problem can happen when a player is told to hit down with the driver, without understanding what that really means. If he fixates on that, it’s easy to see where he could get very steep, hitting a weak slice, a smother, or even a skyball off the top of the face.

Clearly, since the club head moves downward for the first half of the downswing, a player is technically hitting down. There’s really no other way to swing a club, unless it looks something like a baseball player swinging at a high pitch. The main point I’ve been trying to make is simply that the ball is struck while the club is on it’s way back up (with a driver) because of its position relative to the bottom of the swing arc.

I’m pretty sure we’re all on just about the same page.

Posted on October 29th, 2008 at 6:48 pm
20
Nils said:

I think the trick is to straighten the legs, particularly the left leg, at impact. Look at Tiger! Reversing the direction of the club from down to up, creates a tremendous whip lash effect (angular momentum). In other words, while the club still is on its way down, raise the body by straightening the legs! Some instruction says “hit into a firm left wall”, but what is more firm than mother earth? I say, hit down and then use your powerfull legs for the take off.

Posted on December 1st, 2008 at 12:32 pm
21
Bill said:

Great comments on this subject. I look forward to seeing some video examples.

Posted on January 10th, 2009 at 2:17 am
22
Hitting Up with the Driver, Yet Again said:

[...] again, the issue of “hitting up” with the driver has resurfaced. We’ve debated the issue here on several occasions. Now, Golf Magazine has reaffirmed its own previous research [...]

Posted on January 18th, 2009 at 8:37 pm
23
Dan said:

A little late to the party… but I agree with Double Eagle. It’s a bit deceptive and really comes down to semantics. Looking at the overall swing, you can see how it would be treated as a descending blow and in fact is…

Posted on March 2nd, 2009 at 10:21 pm

Connect

Random Tip
My Latest Shot at the 100-Putt Drill
One of the best ways work on short putts is the 100-putt drill. It basically consists of putting a ring of balls around a hole, with each one about three feet out (approximately a putter length). Simply start putting until you make 100 in a row. It’s much more difficult than it sounds.

Not only is it a test of the mechanics of the putting stroke, but it’s also a test of concentration. Staying properly focused on 100 short putts in [...]
Read More...

Poll
What is your primary golf goal for the season?
- I want to drastically improve my game
- I want to make minor to moderate improvement
- I want to compete more
- I want to win more money from my opponents
- I want to have more fun
- I don't have any specific goals
View Results
Loading ...