
Widening Shot Target Expectations
Posted by Double Eagle in Mental Game
In the December 2007 issue of Golf Magazine, there was an interesting piece of instruction by Charlie King that I’m not sure I agree with.
In the “Your Game” section (p. 68) in an article titled “How to Putt for Birdie Every Time“, King brings up an interesting concept in target selection in golf.
He says that instead of shooting for the pin (in a situation that calls for it - fairway lie, center-cut hole), that you should instead give yourself a much bigger target than just the flag stick. He says that with such a precise target, you might tend to put too much pressure on yourself and tend to not swing freely.
I agree with the part about not swinging freely if you put too much pressure on yourself, but I don’t believe the cause is a target that is too specific.
Everything I recall reading and learning about the mental game says that the more specific the target, the better.
The problem instead comes when we become results oriented. When we don’t have absolute commitment to a shot because of fear of the outcome, we’re doomed to failure.
King goes on to suggest a drill where you hit balls to a target on the driving range, five at a time. If you don’t get three of them in your target area, then you’d widen it and hit five more balls until three out of five land within your area. Then, you’d take this “zone” out to the course and use it when faced with a similar shot.
I’m really having trouble seeing how this will help a player make more birdies.
Typically, when we widen our margins for error, we’ll perform to that level. It’s like giving our minds permission to get lazy.
If you stand on the tee and your target is simply the fairway, then you’re going to have trouble seeing the shot in your mind, committing to it, and having trust that you will execute it.
Mentally, golf is a very difficult game. I’ve come to appreciate the ideas of the mental game gurus like Bob Rotella. One of the principles in his book Golf is Not a Game of Perfect is that, “before taking any shot, a golfer must pick out the smallest possible target” (p. 61).
After having applied his principles to my own game, I’ve seen definite improvement.
When I came to understand that trust in my swing and commitment to the shot were very important, I started to improve, even when my technical competence was failing me.
I’ve given this topic a lot of thought. My intent was to write about it soon after I read it, but I wanted to think about it a little more. After letting the idea stew for a while, I just can’t see the benefit.
The idea simply gives players the permission to not focus on specific targets and to be results oriented, instead of simply being shot committed and realizing that we’re not always going to hit the mark.
I just don’t believe that a player that’s just aiming for somewhere on the green will make more birdies.
What do you think about this concept?


YellowYards said:
Posted on December 5th, 2007 at 9:10 am
Double Eagle said:
Posted on December 5th, 2007 at 9:34 am
TP Golf Online said:
Posted on December 5th, 2007 at 11:44 am
The Happy Rock said:
Posted on December 6th, 2007 at 11:33 am
Mike Pedersen Golf said:
Posted on December 6th, 2007 at 7:40 pm