Nike Golf is so confident that the SQ Dymo STR8-FIT driver is longer than the TaylorMade R9, that it asked consumers to hit both and see for themselves.  I was happy to participate when a representative of Nike Golf asked me to take the challenge.  STR8-FIT driver in hand, I went out and procured an R9, and then it was ON.

For those not familiar, these two drivers are the latest in the blossoming trend of adjustable drivers.  Each driver has the ability to remove the shaft, change its position, and create a different face/lie angle combination.

For instance, if you slice, you can set the face closed a little to help you straighten out.  Or, if you’re playing a course that challenges you with a lot of drives that set up left to right, you can set the face to be open a little, to help you meet the challenge a little easier.

The R9 goes the extra length of including three adjustable weights, allowing you to tweak the weight distribution to help you promote right-to-left or left-to-right shots.

I had a chance to take both drivers to the driving range and to the course to see which performed better. Technically, the 8>9 challenge is about length, but I’m not letting Nike Golf off that easy.  I’m considering the total package.

Before I get into my thoughts, let’s have a look at the specs on each.

TaylorMade R9 left, Nike STR8-FIT right

Specifications

For the tests, I have both drivers with stiff shafts and 9.5° of loft.  I elected to test the SQ Dymo instead of the Dymo² which is the square-headed version.  I did this because the R9 has a traditional shape and wanted to compare a traditionally-shaped driver to it.

The STR8-FIT comes with a 45.75″ shaft with a 460cc head.  The adjustable shaft allows for eight different hitting positions:  neutral 2° upright, neutral 2° flat, 1° closed and upright (meaning 1° closed and 1° upright), 2° closed, 1° closed and flat, 1° open and upright, 1° open and flat, and 2° open.

The TaylorMade R9 comes with a slightly smaller 420cc head and a half-inch shorter shaft, coming in at 45.25″. It also has 8 different hitting positions, ranging from 2° open to 2° closed, with some of them varying the lie angle, as well.  In addition, as I mentioned above, it has three weights in the head, with one heavier than the other two, allowing you to place more weight on the heel or toe, to counteract a hook or slice tendency.

The Nuts and Bolts (and Tools and Accessories)

Both drivers come with a tool for removing the head, to make adjustments.

The STR8-FIT comes with a wrench-like tool, that is used to loosen a nut which kind of looks like a ferrule where the shaft meets the head.  When tightening the nut, the wrench gives a beep, a light flash, and a tactile sensation to let you know when the appropriate tightness has been achieved.

The R9 works a little differently.  The head is removed by loosening a screw on the bottom of the head.  The tool supplied by TaylorMade is a T-shaped wrench, similar to a hex key.  It doesn’t beep and light up, but it does provide torque capability, clicking when you reach the correct tightness with the screw.

In both cases, switching the face angle and lie is a simple process.  It only takes about a minute if you know which setting you want and don’t need to refer to the manual first.  The STR8-FIT requires a little less dexterity than the R9 for a quick change (my big hands have an easier time with the Nike wrench than the TalyorMade one), but both clubs are easy to modify.

The STR8-FIT head cover comes with a pouch for the wrench, making it more readily available than the TaylorMade wrench which stays in the bag.  The down side is, if you lose the head cover, you lose the wrench.

Edge: STR8-FIT

Cosmetic Appearance

Even though the R9 is 40cc smaller than the STR8-FIT, it has a slightly taller face.  Standing at address, the STR8-FIT head is stretched from front to back, giving it a much larger look.  Note that in the image below, the size difference is not apparent, because the camera was a little closer to the R9.  It is intended to show the shape.  The image in the top section of the post shows the size difference somewhat better.

Top view - STR8-FIT on the left and R9 on the right

STR9-FIT left, R9 right - Heel scuffs came from third-party testing - see below

The STR8-FIT comes with a yellow shaft that turns to black near the grip.  The R9 shaft is a dark metallic red, with a silvery color near the grip.

I like the color scheme of the R9 a little more, and the smaller head is a little more pleasing to me when standing at address.  Though, the STR8-FIT is certainly not bad itself.

Edge: R9

Getting a Grip

Feel-wise, I’m never much a fan of stock driver grips.  These two are both fine, but I like the feel of the STR8-FIT slightly better.

In addition to the feel, the STR8-FIT grip also provides a few nice touches to help with the adjustability of the club.  First, on the butt-end of the grip is a reference to tell you what setting the club is currently at.  It’s not a necessity because you can turn the club upside-down and look at the shaft to see what the setting is, but it’s a nice touch.  Second, there’s a little yellow arrow on the shaft indicating the neutral position.  If you leave the driver set to neutral, it’s a nice reference to show that you’re gripping the club squarely.

Edge: STR8-FIT, but I’d likely switch to one of my favorite Winn grips without feeling a sense of loss.

Distance

Now, we’re at the core of the 8>9 challenge.  Distance is what it’s all about.  Claims about distance have dominated golf club advertising for a long time now.  I hesitate to think how many drivers have been sold on distance claims alone.

Unfortunately, I fell short in this test.  I hit both drivers on the driving range twice, and in 9-hole rounds, but yesterday, before I could perform a more scientific analysis of distance, I pulled a muscle near my hip and can’t hit a shot right now.  My intent was to go out to the course this evening and hit about ten balls with each and take measurements with my SkyCaddie, but I’m on the ice and rest routine instead.

All I have to go on is my observation at the driving range, where I hit probably 40 balls with each club.  In that setting, my observation is that the STR8-FIT seemed to go  a little further.  I hit some shots that seemed really long.  The R9 is no slouch, though.  I also hit some fairly long shots with it, but they didn’t appear to be as long as the STR8-FIT.

It kind of makes sense with the bigger club head and slightly longer shaft in the STR8-FIT that it would be a little longer, though I wish I had been able to prove that for myself.

Edge:  STR8-FIT, but not scientifically measured.

Feel

In the category of feel, this is going to sound strange, but the R9 feels too good.  Hitting the ball in the center of the face feels great.  Hitting the ball off-center also feels great.  With the STR8-FIT, hitting the ball in the center of the face feels great.  Hitting the ball off-center feels good.

I’ve never hit a driver that felt as good as the R9 on mishits.  That’s a slight negative to me, though.  My reasoning for that is, to me, the feel of a shot is critically important to the learning and adjustment process.  When I mishit a shot, I want to be able to tell from feel where I missed on the face. With the R9, the ball flight told me most of the time, but I had to look at the face to see where the hit was, to confirm what I thought I saw.

With the STR8-FIT, I was able to tell much easier where my mishits were.  Again, they felt good, but not so good that they felt like solid shots.

Edge: STR8-FIT, but if you don’t care about tactile feedback from each shot, then R9, by far.

Sound

Studies have shown that sound and feel are closely related in golf.  Apparently, when golfers are asked to hit shots without being able to hear the sound of impact, their feel is drastically different.  Weird, huh?

Well, with these two, the STR8-FIT definitely has a more pronounced sound at impact.  More of a metallic ping, though it’s definitely much less severe than my Callaway FT-i.  The R9 is somewhat softer and less pronounced.  I wonder if this is why I think the R9 has too much feel?

Edge: STR8-FIT, because I like a pronounced sound.

Performance

I tried both clubs in various positions and I feel that the adjustability in both cases works exactly as advertised.

If you read regularly, you know I’ve been working on my swing a lot, so I’m not in a place where I have a very consistent swing right now.  But, both drivers produced some absolute laser beams for me in the neutral position.  And with the adjustments, I was able to turn the ball a little, as expected by each adjustment.

The only challenge is not making subconscious compensations when you see the face slightly open or closed at address when you’ve adjusted it that way.

As for trajectory, both clubs gave me a fairly high flight.  The STR8-FIT seemed a little more penetrating, with a better trajectory for me, but they were both pretty good.

Edge: STR8-FIT by a little, but the R9 was right there.

Third-Party Testing

I thought it would be interesting and informative to have a third-party help me test these drivers, so I enlisted my brother.  Unfortunately, his swing speed is somewhat slower than mine, so the loft and shaft flex were probably somewhat inappropriate for his swing.

After hitting about 20 balls with each, he declared the R9 as the clear winner.  I wonder if the higher degree of feel made the R9 more pleasant for him, given that the shaft wasn’t right.  He did hit some quality shots with both clubs, though.

Edge:  R9

Conclusion

Both of these drivers are quality offerings from their respective companies.

However, taken as an overall package, the Nike Dymo STR8-FIT is the clear winner to me.  There wasn’t really one category where the STR8-FIT blew away the R9 (except maybe feel, and my criteria may not even suit your tastes, and distance, but I wasn’t able to prove it scientifically), but taken as an overall picture, the STR8-FIT is a better fit for me.

In terms of making adjustments to the lie and face angles, both performed well and never did I feel like I was hitting a club that had the shaft removed seconds before.

The TaylorMade R9 is a very capable club, and even though I wasn’t able to conduct a scientific distance test, I believe Nike’s claims that the STR8-FIT performs longer in customer comparison testing.

I’m not sure how big a deal the adjustable face/lie is be to consumers.  I feel like it probably has the most utility by being set up for a particular course where holes might bend predominantly one way or the other.

Being able to close or open the face is a nice feature, though, for a player with a chronic hook or slice, but in that case, the player will probably adjust the head once and leave it like that.

That said, I now own both clubs (yes, I bought the R9) and have the option of putting either one in my bag or staying with my Callaway FT-i Tour driver.  I’m putting the STR8-FIT in my bag because I believe it’s a better club for me than the other two.  I credit Nike Golf for having the guts to put the STR8-FIT up against the R9.  After all, how embarrassing would it have been for them to issue the challenge and have me say I’m putting the R9 in my bag? Fortunately, I agree with their assessment that the STR8-FIT is superior to the R9 and I’m betting my game on it.

Final Verdict: Nike Dymo STR8-FIT is going in my bag.

© 2007-2011 Life in the Rough. All Rights Reserved.

The 8>9 Challenge: Nike SQ Dymo STR8-FIT vs. TaylorMade R9

I’m a huge fan of Odyssey putters, so naturally I was leaning toward those.  After trying several different models, I found myself drawn to the White Hot XG #7.  It was no impulse purchase, though.  I stewed over the decision for several weeks, trying to decide whether I was ready to let my White Hot #1 fade into retirement.

As you certainly guessed, I bought the putter, and am glad that I did.

Let’s have a look at the official line about the XG line from Odyssey Golf:

The White Hot XG is the next generation of White Hot Technology. Inspired by proven, high-performance, multi-layer golf ball technology, the White Hot XG is Odyssey’s latest advancement that utilizes a multi-layer insert for phenomenal performance on the green. It combines two materials with different properties to take the level of feedback, feel and distance control to an all-new, extreme level.

• Elastomer Core Material – Soft for great feel, and highly resilient to get the ball rolling quickly.
• Thin, outer striking surface – Firm for fine-tuned responsiveness.
• Textured Impact Zone – Enhances feel and clearly defines the sweet spot.

All together, it allows weight to be shifted to the perimeter of the putter head for a high MOI, creating even better forgiveness and truer roll than previous models. It’s the softest, most responsive insert we have ever created.

The Good

• The XG #7 provides exceptional feel.  The face insert makes impact feel somewhat soft compared to a typical milled-face putter, but it’s not mushy.  It feels like I’m in total control.
• The weighted “wings” move the weight toward the perimeter of the club face, much like cavity backed irons, meaning off-center hits are more forgiving than what you’d find with a blade putter.
• The wings and alignment dots on top of the face make the putter very easy to align at address.
• The stock grip is very comfortable.
• Distance control is quite good.
• At $119 where I bought it, the price is quite fair.  It’s not uncommon for Odyssey putters to be priced somewhat higher.
• The putter feels very balanced to me.  It’s almost like the putter itself wants to make a good stroke.

The Bad

• Traditionalists may dislike the look of the wings.  A friend commented to me that it looks like a glorified divot tool.  Admittedly, the design took a little getting used to, but it didn’t take long once I got to hit a few putts in the store and was impressed by the stroke characteristics.
• People who demand a very firm feel when striking putts (like the distinct *ping* that Ping putters provide) might not like the feel.  I think it’s very responsive, but it’s definitely a bit softer than what some might prefer.

Conclusion

As a long-time Odyssey fan, the White Hot XG #7 does not disappoint.  It provides exceptional feel and forgiveness over my old faithful White Hot #1.  My lag putting has improved markedly since picking up the XG #7 this summer.  I think that’s attributable to both the increased feel as well as the forgiveness.  Off-center hits definitely don’t get as far off line as they do with my White Hot #1, and they don’t come up as short, for that matter.

If you don’t mind the unique look and are looking for increased feel and forgiveness, then I highly recommend the Odyssey White Hot XG #7.

—————-

Shop for Odyssey putters at Shop.CallawayGolf.com
Shop for pre-owned Odyssey putters at CallawayGolfPreOwned.com

© 2007-2011 Life in the Rough. All Rights Reserved.

Putter Review: Odyssey White Hot XG #7

For the last couple of seasons, square-headed drivers have been starting to gain popularity. The high moment of inertia that they offer leads to excellent forgiveness for off-center hits.

Let’s have a look at a few of the features of the FT-i Tour driver. Click here for a full product description.

According to Callaway:

Fusion Technology – Designed to be the world’s straightest driver, the FT-i Driver is Fusion Technology pushed to the extreme, creating golf’s most Complete Inertial Design. To exploit Fusion Technology—our weight-shifting science that uses multiple materials in clubhead construction—the design demanded a new shape. The FT-i Driver pushes the boundaries of shape, of our imagination, of the rules.

460cc Complete Inertial Design – Positions discretionary weight to the extreme corners of the clubhead, raising the moment of inertia (MOI) for unparalleled resistance to twisting both horizontally and vertically, providing forgiveness on shots hit all over the face.

OptiFit Weighting System – Enables golfers to customize their driver by giving them three different center of gravity (CG) locations to choose from in most lofts: Draw for promoting a draw or reducing a slice/fade; Neutral for maximum workability; or Fade for promoting a fade or reducing a hook/draw.

What those features add up to is high forgiveness. Along with lightweight materials and modified version of Callaway’s Variable Face Thickness (VFT) technology, this driver brings together the top technology that the industry can muster to bring maximum performance and playability.

The FT-i and FT-i Tour models are very similar, but there are a few key differences:

• The shafts offered on the Tour model are mid-launch like the Fujikura Speeder 686, while the standard model offers low/mid launch shafts, like the Fujikura Speeder 586.
• The Tour model offers 8.5° and 9.5° lofts, while the standard model is available in 9°, 10°, 11°, and 13° lofts.

I went with the FT-i Tour model, 9.5° neutral weighting, with the Fujikura Speeder 686 shaft in stiff flex. I’ve had a chance to use the driver for two driving range sessions and one 9-hole round. Here’s what I found out:

The Good

• The claims made about forgiveness are not understated. I’m coming off the tail-end of winter and am early into my adoption of a one-plane swing, so my ball striking isn’t exactly in mid-season form. I was extremely surprised to see that my mis-hits were better than I expected. Almost every shot I hit at the range would’ve played well on my course. Most of my drives at the course found the fairway, with the exception of one I topped.
• Distance is quite good. For whatever reason, I was tending to strike the ball relatively low on the club face. I’ll work that out in the days to come, but for now, I was getting the ball out to 260 yards with thinly-struck shots on relatively cold days. When I start hitting the ball solidly and the temperature warms up, look out.
• I don’t have specific stats on the weight of the club, but to me, it feels slightly heavier than my Nike Ignite driver. Some may consider that a negative, but I like the feeling that I’m swinging something of substance. These modern clubs with lightweight materials leave me feeling mentally like I’m not putting enough mass on the ball.
• The sound of the hit is quite different than what I’m used to. These days, the high-pitched “ping” seems to be the norm with drivers. This club has a much lower tone, giving the sense that I just killed the ball.
• The club has great workability. I was able to easily work the ball right and left. It gave me great confidence that I’ll be able to shape the ball when I need to.

The Bad

• I can’t ignore the one question I know you have right off the bat: yes, the square club head does take some getting used to. However, it’s something I got used to quickly.
• It took me a bit to get the feel of what the club head looks like properly squared at address. My first several shots went right, until I realized that the face wasn’t quite square at address. As I said, the square head just looks different and takes some getting used to. Once I found that out, it was bombs away.
• The price is pretty high at around $500. As I mentioned, I bought the club from Callaway Golf Pre-owned for just over $300. The club was like-new, just as advertised. That’s a good alternative for those of us who can’t bear to spend $500 on a new driver.

Conclusion

As I said at the top, I love this club. The forgiveness is as good as advertised. The high MOI makes sure that off-center hits still have a chance to find the fairway. Distance is right where it needs to be and it’s easy to shape shots.

All these positives outweigh the negatives, with price being a possible exception. I would have never paid $500 for a driver, so buying a used one was my only alternative. I was pleased with the condition of the used driver and to me, it’s as good as new for savings of almost $200.

Price aside, this club performs extremely well in all areas. I can’t wait for the season to start up. Even my short time with the club has given me a new confidence off the tee that will serve me well this year. I highly recommend the Callaway FT-i Tour driver.

————————-

Further Reading:

FT-i Tour Driver at Callaway Golf
Shop for the FT-i Tour at Callaway Golf Pre-owned

© 2007-2011 Life in the Rough. All Rights Reserved.

Club Review: Callaway FT-i Tour Driver