Should Tournament Golf and Recreational Golf Diverge?

Cheater

I had an interesting phone conversation last night with someone from the golf industry that I’m going to tell you more about some time in the next several days. One of the things we discussed, at length, is the idea that there is a serious disconnect between tournament golf and the enjoyment that recreational players derive from the game. The Rules of Golf are probably the biggest divergence between the best players in the world and the rest of us. They have to play the Rules to the letter or suffer dire consequences. Weekend players, however, take extreme liberties with them. In many cases, it’s not even out of a desire to cheat. Sometimes, it’s a matter of ignorance. It’s also an issue of the Rules not always being practical on busy public courses. Be honest, how many of you go back to the tee to hit another shot after you’ve discovered that your ball is lost or has ended up out of bounds? All of the golf leagues I’ve been involved with had local rules

Got Your Rule Book Handy?

Let me guess:  no? The beauty of the Rules of Golf is that the book is small and can easily fit into your golf bag.  I know, the decisions book is a different story, but having the roles handy is a good start. I keep the Rules in my bag because the last thing I want is to get out on the course and not know how to proceed and just have to wing it, only to find out that I have to tack a mountain of strokes to my score, or even worse, I’m disqualified. It’s not a big deal if you’re just out playing for fun, but in a tournament situation, or when you’re competing seriously (i.e. for money and/or glory), you want to have the answers at arm’s reach. Still not going to pack the Rules in your bag?  OK, I get it.  Fortunately, there’s one rule to remember in case of emergency that will help you out of a jam. Rule 3-3, “Doubt as to Procedure” will help you, should you

Rules of Golf Changes for 2008

Next year starts another rules cycle. Every four years, the USGA and R&A get together to iron out changes to the rules and to the decisions on the rules. New changes will be in effect on January 1, 2008. You can access documents comparing the 2008 changes to the rules and decisions against the current rules and decisions here. There aren’t any significant changes this cycle. Yes, out of bounds is still stroke and distance. Most changes are simply revisions to clarify and strengthen wording. Here are some highlights: Distance is explicitly listed as information not constituting “advice”. Under rule 12-1, there is now no penalty if a ball that is in or on an obstruction is moved during search. Previously, this only covered abnormal ground conditions. It is now permissible for a player under rule 14-3 to use artificial devices or unusual equipment or equipment in an unusual manner, provided it is medically necessary and the Committee decides that it does not give an unfair advantage over other players. Allowing no penalty for making

Revamp the Rules – Six Changes I’d Make

I’m a law and order guy. I follow and respect the Rules of Golf. Honestly though, is there anyone out there that wouldn’t make some serious changes? I’m not talking about changing the fundamentals of the game. I’m talking about a little face lift that would make the rules easier to understand and apply, and that would make the game more fun and maybe even quicker to play. Here are my suggestions: Have Competitors Record Their Own Scores This month’s issue of Golf Digest featured Boo Weekly in the My Turn segment and that sparked this entire post. He discussed the incident where he accidentally recorded the wrong score on a hole for Sergio Garcia. Garcia signed the card with the wrong score and was disqualified. He also mentioned that he did it again to Garcia during another tournament, but that time it was caught and corrected. The most famous incident of this kind happened to Roberto DeVicenzo in the 1968 Masters. His fellow competitor, Tommy Aaron, accidentally recorded his score for the 17th hole

The Rules of Golf: Doubt as to Procedure

It’s bound to happen sooner or later, whether in a competitive tournament or in a weekend match that’s taken a little too seriously. Eventually something is going to happen where the rules are not clear. Sometimes a player feels he is entitled to relief but is not entirely certain. Never fear! The Rules are here to help. Rule 3-3 provides guidance when there is a doubt as to procedure. The rule states that if a player is in doubt as to procedure, he may complete the hole with two balls, without penalty. He must notify his fellow competitor (or marker) that he wishes to play two balls, and which he will count if the Rules permit. The player must present the facts to the Committee prior to turning in his scorecard so that a determination can be made. Probably the most famous occurrence of Rule 3-3 happened in the 1958 Masters to Arnold Palmer. On the 12th hole, Palmer sought relief for an embedded ball. The on-site rules official declined. Palmer then announced that he